Ambivalence
RMCM© - The Rational Model of Complex Mechanisms©
Introduction
- While this model could be implemented primitively in software, I am concerned that we might get into difficulty. Nature implements elegant, fecund, and robust organic metabolisms. Metabolic Complexities (Complex Mechanisms) that are diverse (wide differences in scope) and powerfully extensive purities.
The implementation requires only a limited environment and should not be undertaken in current operating systems beyond providing the essential experience required for future hardware design. The problem arises from a need for the Central Processing Unit (CPU). Genuine inorganic implementations of complexity must provide genuine Concurrence, a central pillar of Complexity. The CPU merely simulates concurrence, as it is in direct control of the operating systems of modern digital machines. The Also, the timing provided by a central clock is of limited value.- While clearly the universe is governed by a central clock speed, C2 or GodSong, every mechanical, electrical, chemical, or biological system derives its own clock speed as an attribute of its components. These clocks exist in every granule of such systems. Our implementation of this model (or some corrected derivative of this model) must adhere to the same principle, a clock for each granule and every granule a clock. We will need a radical swing in hardware design, because only a hardware implementation can provide the appropriate constraint on new inorganic behaviors - a constraint that is causal.
- Let us briefly consider the abstraction encapsulated by the English language word Value. Value always resides within some container. This container can be identifiable (expressible); it can be mysterious or profound, or it can be a combination of both depending on how we use the word - depending on its context. Value can be applied to anything considered appropriate by any given user. What is important here is that Value can be seen as some kind of relationship or it can be seen as some kind of event. Relationships and events are the two contexts through which we make sense of our world. We can say that these two attributes of intelligence encapsulate this thing we call Reason. There are two classes of reason - logical reason and spatial reason. Logical reason sees attributes of greater truth in equalities of value bound across the equal sign. Spatial reason sees attributes of greater truth in values that connect events. All of human conflict can be traced to the fight for reciprocity between these two groups. This fight for reciprocity always gravitates around value. Any valid model of the Universe must give rise to an effective encapsulation for reciprocity. It must provide for a robust equivalence of Value. Therefore we must settle on a an omnipotent and omniscient definition for exchange - the definition must be accessible to all and suitable for all. To the extense and scope available to the sensory intelligences that we are, this model and all of its definitions must be rooted in the inarguably self evident. The only construct in the universe that is inarguably self evident is the lever. In this universe, this construct we have come to know as three dimensional SpaceTime, nothing arises or occurs in the absence of the lever. The lever encapsulates both logical reasoning and spatial reasoning. This work, ironically, explores complexity through lever aggregation, rather than exploring the lever in any given implementation. This is because complexity is a work in progress, and regardless of where we choose to engage complexity, aggregates of levers will extend infinitely both inwardly and outwardly.
- Also, let us briefly consider the value understood as Pi. Pi is considered to be the relationship between the circumference of a circle to the diameter of the circle. This has likely been the case for all contemporary users of this word since it was discovered. When implementing a circle using Pi, the best we can do is implement an approximation of Pi. A true circle is something that simply cannot exist. In other words because the number, the Value, encapsulated by Pi can never be acquired in its totality Pi can never represent an existential event. Because there can be no existential event "Pi", we see a universe of spirals and helixes. Because there can be no Pi "event", any implementable model of the universe must exclude Pi, because any such model must represent an aggregate of events. This holds true for all irrational numbers and for all transcendental numbers. We are confused, by theories based on the existentiality of the irrational, about the duality of light. To accept Pi as an existential attribute of three dimensional SpaceTime requires that we construct something that accounts for it. We have encapsulated the idea of Time as plastic material to allow us to accept Pi or the irrational as the existential. The error in contemporary thinking about complexity is that in order to accept the concept of existential primitives or ultimate particles requires that we step outside of the complex to explain the complex. This model denies any such irrational capacity and so any irrational requirement. This model excludes the idea of the "object oriented primitive" altogether. This model only distinguishes between simplicities and complexities preferring instead to understand the Universe as an aggregate of concurrent events or implementations. This model asserts that the whole idea of three dimensional SpaceTime is simply an illusion acquire by intelligences that arise out the sensory. This Model Asserts that the alternative to an infinite expansion of the universe must be the infinite contraction of the Universe. Rather than an "XYZ" temporal origin we see the universe as simply an aggregate suspended, is it were, within some context of the infinitely inward bound to the infinitely outward. The universe is a complexity arising out of inward simplicities and simpler purer attributes of vast outward complexities. The Rational Model of Complex Mechanisms asserts that the universe exists within God. The Model asserts the Theory of relativity is wrong, and that nature of the universe encapsulated by E=MC2 is found not in plastic time but instead in the frequency of GodSong - The Speed Of Light Squared - C2 .
Copyright 2004,2009 Donald Weetman Cameron; Written and designed by Donald Weetman Cameron; Developed by Donald Weetman Cameron and Richard Silliker
The Rational Model of Complex Mechanisms (RMCM)
C4E© - Church of the Fourth Experience©(C4E)
Art by Richard Silliker
The RMCM BlogAdded by DWC 25 August 2009
|
| Complexity |
| Visit this group |