Ambivalence

RMCM©  - The Rational Model of Complex Mechanisms©

 

Experience
  1. In understanding fully the differences between motion and movement we must begin to reflect on them in living and intelligent systems. Unfortunately, we have precise definitions neither for intelligence nor for life. Our experience of living systems is confined to the organic, and our experience of intelligence is personal and lacks an inorganic implementable encapsulation. With all of our concepts the same difficulty presents. We have an idea of what we are referring to, yet we have no precise set of immutable attributes. Such encapsulations also include mass, gravity, time, infinity, small, large and pretty much any word that lacks a clear definition.

  2. What these all have in common is that they reside on the frontier of human knowledge. We know them only by our experience of them. The words that describe concepts are tags attached to things we do or things done to us and or others; they can encapsulate events or collections of events and they encapsulate the consequences of events or collections of events. We all can fret about our weight without having any idea of what mass is or how gravity comes to exist. Humans can raise families and love each other generation after generation without any definable idea of an origin or greater truth.

  3. We can even be highly complex without any knowledge of how complexity is designed and without the slightest capacity to read or write or think beyond our next meal. All animals have the capacity to learn from experience, yet we see intellect as something different from experience rather than just a more complex form of experience.

  4. The Model simply sidesteps the idea of life and intelligence encapsulating rather the attributes of all events as its model, and applying the term Rational Paradigm. A Rational Paradigm is any aggregate of events that fully implements all the shared attributes of an intelligent event. Regardless of where or how in the universe Rational Paradigms occur, they will be as fully alive as are we. The difference between their intelligence and ours would be simply a difference in the complex mechanisms that arbitrate Value arising from metabolism as abstraction.

  5. Evolution as we refer to it is the appearance of order without an implementable encapsulation of that order. The Model sidesteps this complicated issue and simply encapsulates all increase in Complexity from Rational Paradigm to Rational Paradigm and within any Rational Paradigm (gestation up to and including adulthood) as Growth. The Model defines Growth as the Abstraction of Value from metabolism. Metabolism is viewed as the aggregate events that give rise to all flow and the flow itself within any Rational Paradigm. The Model, can now entertain a meaningful excursion into experience.

  6. The Model defines Experience as any change to an aggregate that becomes an attribute of that aggregate©. The Model asserts all aggregates have the capacity for experience.  The Model Defines this capacity as Attribution. The Model asserts that all aggregates are aggregates of experience. DNA is an aggregate of experience. Rational Paradigms are aggregates of experience. Experience encapsulates the universe as an iterative aggregation of events and satisfies the assertion that complexity must be constrained to an encapsulation of events as opposed to an encapsulation of relationships. The Model encapsulates Complexity Experientially and in this way encapsulates The Conditions of The Innate, The Intrinsic, and The Abstract. The attributes of points are experiences. We can extrapolate that GodSong is a Divine experience, and that our souls are Divine containers for the encapsulation of our experience as Rational Paradigms. We can further extrapolate that we arose and persist for the experience of God and as the experience of God. We can further extrapolate that all scripture is an aggregate of consensus on our best understanding of our experience of God.

  7. We must pause and understand a little of The Model's use of the word "Truth". Even Divine Truth must be Rational within "this" Universe. To this end and within this context, The Rational Model of Complex Mechanisms asserts that The Universe is Rational, The universe arose and continues to arise as the abstraction of value from Metabolism, and that the universe itself is a Rational Paradigm. From this understanding the Model encapsulates the universe instead simply as "The Rational". While The Model holds General Science and General Mathematics in high esteem, these disciplines currently appear to be preoccupied with Three Dimensional SpaceTime.

  8. The Model Encapsulates Three Dimensional SpaceTime as The ThreDiST View of the Rational - or ThreDism for short. The fundamental difference between The Model and ThreDism is the encapsulation of time as the material explaining E=MC2 . The Model considers Time to be undefined and ThreDism to be only one way of understanding The Rational.

  9. Another fundamental difference between The Rational Model of Complex Mechanisms and The ThreDiST© view is the encapsulation of a Center Point. ThreDism© views the center point as the intersection of their three axis "XYZ". The Model asserts that while acceptable in theory, ThreDism© limits infinity to a spherical extension from only that intersection, or the Zero point of the "XYZ" axis. The Rational Model of Complex Mechanisms, The Model, asserts that in ThreDism©, every point in and of itself must be, by definition, the centre of a spherical infinity. While supposed theoretically possible, there is another more Rational explanation for a Universe of infinite centers. The Model asserts that the only Rational provision for an infinity of centers would be the existence of flow arising and descending along an axis extending from the infinitely inward (infintely small) and the infinitely outward (infinitely large).

  10. The Rational Model of Complex Mechanisms asserts that The Rational exists as nothing more than an event arising as the concurrent aggregation of points on line segments extending from the inwardly infinite to the outwardly infinite.

  11. To avoid terrible conflict of claims to the truth as encapsulated by these alleged disparities, we must agree that any truth we can possibly lay claim to as Truth, can only ever really be an attribute of some greater truth. Can we agree that all attributes disclosed by both The Rational Model of Complex Mechanisms and ThreDism© are simply attributes of greater truth? In this context the model requires that we understand that all Rational Paradigms sacrifice the whole truth of any given experience for the value to which they are constrained. This means that We sacrifice the whole truth of any given experience for the value to which we are constrained.

  12. We are constrained to that which we can experience. Our minds are assumed to be mysterious experiences sitting above our metabolism in judgment and evaluation of our behavior and the behavior of those around us. The Model asserts that what we have called the mind in various languages and for millennia, is rather a container of experience.

  13. The Model asserts that Rational Paradigms experience, Innately, Intrinsically, and Abstractly. The mind, The Model asserts, is simply The Third Experience - the experience of the experience of experience.

  14. This encapsulation, Third Experience©, orients us toward technology's next step. Implementing an inorganic metabolism to contain and innately constrain a Fourth Experience. The most complex implementation of intrinsic experience is the human hand. The Third Experience may be an Inexpression of complexity greater than the human hand. An experience beyond the extant capacity of organic scope and extension.

  15. The Third Experience©, E3, is an orchestration of The Second Experience© (Behavior), E2. As we grow from the implementation of persistence, complexity increases as Experience diversifies concurrently. As Experience diversifies purity expresses. All attributes of any multi-cellular Rational Paradigm lie hidden within the innate experience of DNA. DNA is an inexpressed Rational Paradigm.

Copyright 2004,2009 Donald Weetman Cameron; Written and designed by Donald Weetman Cameron; Developed by Donald Weetman Cameron and Richard Silliker

HOME

The Rational Model of Complex Mechanisms (RMCM)
C4E© - Church of the Fourth Experience©(C4E)
Art by Richard Silliker
The RMCM Blog

 
 
Posted by DWC 27, August 2009

Google Groups
Complexity
Visit this group